| 10 Best & Worst Walking Cities |
|
|
| by Charles Stuart Platkin | |
| Wednesday, 05 March 2008 | |
|
This year's 10 best and 10 worst walking cities in the United States, according to the Prevention/American Podiatric Medical Association, study: 10 Best U.S. Walking Cities of 2008
1. Cambridge, MA
2. New York, NY
3. Ann Arbor, MI
4. Chicago, IL
5. Washington, DC
6. San Francisco, CA
7. Honolulu, HI
8. Trenton, NJ
9. Boston, MA
10. Cincinnati, OH
10 Worst U.S. Walking Cities of 2008
1. Oklahoma City, OK
2. North Las Vegas, NV
3. Gadsden, AL
4. Davenport, IA
5. Mount Pleasant, SC
6. Enid, OK
7. Laredo, TX
8. Springdale, AR
9. Clarksville, TN
10. Lafayette, LA
Cambridge, MA, is the Best Walking City in America, with more residents walking to work and more parks per square mile than any other city evaluated, according to a just-released study by Prevention magazine and the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA). Walking kudos also goes to New York, ranked #2, and Ann Arbor, #3. The Worst Walking Cities: Oklahoma City, North Las Vegas, and Gadsden, AL. Prevention and the APMA annually team up to measure the walkability of America's cities as interest in walking for fitness remains strong. Walking is the most popular form of exercise with 87.5% of Americans walking for fitness. New in this year's survey, more than 500 U.S. cities, including D.C., were evaluated and ranked on 14 walking criteria, including the percentage of adults who walk to work, number of parks per square mile, use of mass transit, and percentage of adults who walk for fitness. Also new this year, a Best Walking City was named in each of the 50 states from an evaluation of its 10 most populated cities. (For a complete list, go to www.prevention.com/50bestcities or pick up Prevention's April issue, on newsstands today.) Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 March 2008 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|










